diff options
| author | neodarz <neodarz@neodarz.net> | 2018-08-11 20:21:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | neodarz <neodarz@neodarz.net> | 2018-08-11 20:21:34 +0200 |
| commit | 0ea5fc66924303d1bf73ba283a383e2aadee02f2 (patch) | |
| tree | 2568e71a7ccc44ec23b8bb3f0ff97fb6bf2ed709 /pipermail/nel/2001-July/000478.html | |
| download | nevrax-website-self-hostable-0ea5fc66924303d1bf73ba283a383e2aadee02f2.tar.xz nevrax-website-self-hostable-0ea5fc66924303d1bf73ba283a383e2aadee02f2.zip | |
Initial commit
Diffstat (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-July/000478.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | pipermail/nel/2001-July/000478.html | 84 |
1 files changed, 84 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000478.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000478.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..bba93532 --- /dev/null +++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000478.html @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Nel] TCP vs. UDP</TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ymorvan%40ens-lyon.fr"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000500.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000495.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Nel] TCP vs. UDP</H1> + <B>Yann Morvan</B> + <A HREF="mailto:ymorvan%40ens-lyon.fr" + TITLE="[Nel] TCP vs. UDP">ymorvan@ens-lyon.fr</A><BR> + <I>Thu, 5 Jul 2001 16:59:27 +0200 (MET DST)</I> + <P><UL> + <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000500.html">[Nel] TCP vs. UDP</A></li> + <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000495.html">[Nel] Power cut</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#478">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#478">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#478">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#478">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>I've read the thread on MUD-Dev and some people here, +who seem to be quite experienced, say that TCP is not a +good choice for client/server communication when there are +many users and with real time constraints and it seems reasonable +since TCP implements re-emit mecanisms which are irrelevent +if the resent data doesn't matter anymore. They +say that UDP is a better choice, though EA and AC designed their own +layer. I am not a network expert but I think it would be wise to ponder +things thoroughly on that point, but I realize that designing one's own +layer (even using UDP as a starting point) is probably quite a hard task. + + Yann + + + +</pre> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000500.html">[Nel] TCP vs. UDP</A></li> + <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000495.html">[Nel] Power cut</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#478">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#478">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#478">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#478">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> +</body></html> |