diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'source/_posts/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md')
-rw-r--r-- | source/_posts/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/source/_posts/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md b/source/_posts/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md index a9f27ae8..f68ea55d 100644 --- a/source/_posts/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md +++ b/source/_posts/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ layout: post title: "2014 Nobel Prize in Physics — LED lights, seriously?" date: 2014-11-06 11:08:45 -0800 comments: true -categories: [physics, nobel, physicists] +categories: --- For some reason, I only learned about this year’s laureates today, through [the reference frame](http://motls.blogspot.com/2014/11/ex-employer-wont-meet-blue-led-nobel.html). The prize goes to the inventors of the LED. Not exciting at all, so I don’t care if I’m ever informed. (Lubos has a good point on why applied physics — well, let’s even widen the concept of applied physics a bit — should not surprise anyone when they appear in a Nobel Prize announcement: “After all, Alfred Nobel might have very well considered his dynamite to be a discovery in physics, too.”) |