aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pipermail/nel/2001-June/000447.html
blob: 11a6773147912ecf2d75689078014e605f11df86 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Nel] Congratulations + concerns</TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:stephane.craux%40voila.fr">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000450.html">
   <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000451.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Nel] Congratulations + concerns</H1>
    <B>stephane.craux@voila.fr</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:stephane.craux%40voila.fr"
       TITLE="[Nel] Congratulations + concerns">stephane.craux@voila.fr</A><BR>
    <I>Sat, 30 Jun 2001 23:36:52 +0200</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000450.html">[Nel] Game Rules</A></li>
        <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000451.html">[Nel] Congratulations + concerns</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#447">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#447">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#447">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#447">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>&gt;<i> So please tell me if there is a solution or if I should
</I>&gt;<i> give up using Nel (but then again, please understand that
</I>&gt;<i> I totaly agree with the idea of sharing my improvments of
</I>&gt;<i> the library).
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> 	Yann
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> P.S. I understand the passion behind the free software notion, however,
</I>&gt;<i> in the very field of MMORPG, the inability to protect your rules -
</I>&gt;<i> the spirit of your game - leaves the opportunity to a greater
</I>&gt;<i> company, if they happen to be popular, to deprive you of the pleasure
</I>&gt;<i> of running your game by draining your playerbase by using its marketing
</I>&gt;<i> power. You then end up with the opposite of the reason why you thrive
</I>&gt;<i> for free software: people make profit over your ideas because of their
</I>&gt;<i> mere initial wealth.
</I>
I think u just point out here the Open Source Concept as one 
of the biggest joke of the end of twentieth century .

Software code in itself is not that important thing when GPL is concerned, 
and beeing able to read it and extract the major concepts of a software is 
the great thing  : u always proceed with reverse engineering , - the ever 
coming question how do they do that - even when using software like ... 
those which don't provide source code .

That's why GPL is a bad trick to minor companies and therefore for individuals :
releasing code shows the overall software architecture , may let u get insights 
about hardcore coded sections and definitively unprotects the source providers .

Good and Exceptionnal concepts are quickly analysed (you always need to understand
the philosophy that drives a software architecture to be able to use it)
So major companies will reuse GPLed code that much faster than minor entities
- as far as software production is concerned - 
I think that instead of promoting talents ,GPL comes with a global leverage tendance .

The company I work for prohibits the reuse of GPL code and tends to minimize 
the usage of LGPL ed source code : no need to ask a lawyer why , everybody
will laugh at u if u ask and I think the boss is right here .
Great support is provided to software users , but anyway , any reliable company 
protects its sources ( Nevrax Executives don ot read that ). Please note 
that I'm in no way related to MS . 
Isn't GPL the biggest break to creativity we ever seen since communism died 
out of realism ?

Would GPL minds expect great french wine caves to make their 'elevage' 
methods publically available - I love great wines - , but who ever thought 
that we would get better wine through that way , that's not a reliable way of 
thinking and only fools rush in .


I don't want to minimize the brightness of people who go promoting the GPL concept ,
(I 've the reputation to use my mind in very efficient ways though ) , but
since I'm tightened to realism in my comapany , I totally agree with GPL detractors .
Privacy is definitively needed or the world dies out of any will .

I realize i might be removed from the list after that ,
but I don't think it will happen .

Back to development and implementation , lots of to do ahead (I wouldn't be there if not)

Stephane Craux
<A HREF="mailto:Stephane.Craux@voila.fr">Stephane.Craux@voila.fr</A>
__________________________________________________
Voila vous propose une boite aux lettres gratuite sur Voila Mail:
<A HREF="http://mail.voila.fr">http://mail.voila.fr</A>




</pre>





<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000450.html">[Nel] Game Rules</A></li>
	<LI> Next message: <A HREF="000451.html">[Nel] Congratulations + concerns</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#447">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#447">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#447">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#447">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
</body></html>