1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:thierry%40mallard.com">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000217.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="000230.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</H1>
<B>Thierry Mallard</B>
<A HREF="mailto:thierry%40mallard.com"
TITLE="[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?">thierry@mallard.com</A><BR>
<I>Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:56:54 +0100</I>
<P><UL>
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000217.html">[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</A></li>
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="000230.html">[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#229">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#229">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#229">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#229">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:43:59PM -0600, Jared Mark wrote:
><i> Okay, so what you're saying is basically this...
</I>><i>
</I>><i> By seperating the services, you can have a cluster of machines, each running
</I>><i> different services, and thus, keeping the load down across the board. You
</I>><i> would have a single system, for example, handling just combat resolution,
</I>><i> and you would have another system that would keep track of the database...
</I>
We may have to add features concerning high-availability, as this scheme
doesn't allow it : if the computing holding the combat resolution fails, the
world will be a heaven of peace ;-)
The second point is that if a service grow too much, the load-balancing won't
respond to the problem. You mentionned this point in your previous mail I
think.
One possible architecture is to write separate process, and give two or three
computer the responsiblity to distribute, by monitoring the farm, those
process. I dunno if such scheme is possible w.r.t. the current NeL objectives
(?)
Best regards,
Shaman
--
Thierry Mallard |
GnuPG key on wwwkeys.pgp.net |
key 0xA3D021CB |
<A HREF="http://thierry.mallard.com">http://thierry.mallard.com</A> |
</pre>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000217.html">[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</A></li>
<LI> Next message: <A HREF="000230.html">[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#229">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#229">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#229">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#229">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
</body></html>
|
