aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pipermail/nel/2001-June/000441.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-June/000441.html')
-rw-r--r--pipermail/nel/2001-June/000441.html82
1 files changed, 82 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-June/000441.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-June/000441.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..a7a4b9ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-June/000441.html
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Nel] Congratulations + concerns</TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:ymorvan%40ens-lyon.fr">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000431.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000432.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Nel] Congratulations + concerns</H1>
+ <B>Yann Morvan</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:ymorvan%40ens-lyon.fr"
+ TITLE="[Nel] Congratulations + concerns">ymorvan@ens-lyon.fr</A><BR>
+ <I>Sat, 30 Jun 2001 19:57:00 +0200 (MET DST)</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000431.html">[Nel] Re:More news from the nevrax teams...</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000432.html">[Nel] .shape file format change</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#441">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#441">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#441">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#441">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Hullo,
+I've been following the development of NEL for
+some time, I haven't been contributing due to lack
+of spare time, but I wanted to congratulate the
+Nel team for their idea and work.
+
+However, I have one major concern with the licence mecanism.
+Indeed, your idea is that what the people will pay for in
+games based upon Nel is content and not code. Saying this, you
+implicitly state that content and code are completely distinct things.
+It is true for the most part (graphics, sounds, AI scripts, background,
+plots etc),
+but I can't convince myself that it applies to the rules of the game,
+for I can't help to think that for efficiency matters they should be
+hardcoded in the different services. (The reason being that because of
+their level of abstraction, using a scripting mechanism would be terribly
+painful and would require a design of the services architecture allowing
+for total flexibility).
+
+I played Ultima Online for 3 years, I read the rantings of lum the mad
+daily, I read the dev boards of currently in development MMORPGs, I'm
+aware of the specificities of the &quot;big three&quot; and all this leads
+me to the conclusion that the rules (i.e. economy system, combat system,
+advancement system etc) are a part of the content at least as important
+as the rest regarding a game's interest (I wouldn't be willing to
+create a MMORPG if I wasn't utterly frustrated by the current trends
+in those games).
+
+Therefore, while I totaly agree that any improvment
+or further development of Nel's features should be shared, I'd
+like you to reassure me about the protection of one's rule system
+in your design philosophy.
+
+Sorry for this long mail and for reviving this probably old and well
+debated issue :)
+
+ Yann
+
+
+</pre>
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000431.html">[Nel] Re:More news from the nevrax teams...</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000432.html">[Nel] .shape file format change</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#441">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#441">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#441">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#441">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+</body></html>