aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000456.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-July/000456.html')
-rw-r--r--pipermail/nel/2001-July/000456.html96
1 files changed, 96 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000456.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000456.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2de2428a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000456.html
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Nel] Congratulations + concerns</TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:bernard%40bernard-hugueney.org">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000454.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000457.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Nel] Congratulations + concerns</H1>
+ <B>Debian User</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:bernard%40bernard-hugueney.org"
+ TITLE="[Nel] Congratulations + concerns">bernard@bernard-hugueney.org</A><BR>
+ <I>Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:32:23 +0200</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000454.html">[Nel] Congratulations + concerns</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000457.html">[Nel] Snowballs building problem</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#456">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#456">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#456">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#456">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>* Michael Warnock &lt;<A HREF="mailto:michael@in-orbit.net">michael@in-orbit.net</A>&gt; [010701 09:48]:
+&gt;<i> 6/30/2001 3:51:13 PM, <A HREF="mailto:x5101920@fedro.ugr.es">x5101920@fedro.ugr.es</A> wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;Mensaje citado por: Michael Warnock &lt;<A HREF="mailto:michael@in-orbit.net">michael@in-orbit.net</A>&gt;:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>
+&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; legally use gpl'ed code in your own, unreleased programs- and why should
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; we release the server side code?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;I would love that you reply to this answer to me and to Nel guys that are so
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;hard working on such a good project.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> We're quite grateful to them- we've even had them over to our place in san francisco, but it just so happens that they are also at work on a lot of nel based code that they have not released- and they are by no means required to- it is only in the event of distributing binaries that you must distribute source.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;IMO In the same moment that you make public your server you are making it public
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;and you should release it. But I am not a lawyer.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>
+
+My understanding of the GPL is that your do not have to give source code
+if you do not &quot;give&quot; binary. This is a concern to Mr Stallman because
+of the comming Application Services Providers (or that kind of Three Letters
+ Acronym). This should be fixed with the upcoming v 3 of the GPL.
+
+Neither Am I A L., but for the rules parts, my 2 euros :
+the reverse engineering part is not that relevent because you could
+apply to any computer prog. I know that people fitted archmage models in
+matlab, but with LARGE rule sets, I don't think it's realistic.
+I think it could be possible to use propritery code with GPL code
+using a LGLP 'hook' layer. But I'm not sure...
+
+To be on thesafe side, GPL and non-GPL code should not be in the same
+adress-space (ie CORBA).You have to pay an efficiency penalty to keep your code
+non-GPL and that's the intended behaviour IMHO.
+
+For thoses who think GPL is worthless (&quot;a joke&quot;) because you can steal / use
+the code anyway, I think you are missing the point. What matter is not the
+software (state of CVS at time t), but the ongoing project. That's why
+there are VERY few forks on GPL land. Use the code and it's ok, the project
+is working for you. Take the code, change it, and then YOU have to handle
+all the evolution, or keep track of changes (what if they are not compatible
+with yours ?). You can certainly catch-up very easly with a GPL project, and
+it's R&amp;D is available for everyone to use (great karma IMHO), but the
+power of the successful GPL project is not in the code, but in the community
+behind it. (Of course, both are linked, hard to attract people with ugly code)
+
+I really hope that NeL will build such a dedicated and helpful community.
+(Code quality is there IMHO, for network design etc, I'not qualified...)
+
+Bernard
+
+</pre>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000454.html">[Nel] Congratulations + concerns</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000457.html">[Nel] Snowballs building problem</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#456">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#456">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#456">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#456">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+</body></html>