aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pipermail/nel/2001-February/000229.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-February/000229.html')
-rw-r--r--pipermail/nel/2001-February/000229.html78
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-February/000229.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-February/000229.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..eafe2459
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-February/000229.html
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:thierry%40mallard.com">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000217.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000230.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</H1>
+ <B>Thierry Mallard</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:thierry%40mallard.com"
+ TITLE="[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?">thierry@mallard.com</A><BR>
+ <I>Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:56:54 +0100</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000217.html">[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000230.html">[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#229">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#229">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#229">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#229">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:43:59PM -0600, Jared Mark wrote:
+&gt;<i> Okay, so what you're saying is basically this...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> By seperating the services, you can have a cluster of machines, each running
+</I>&gt;<i> different services, and thus, keeping the load down across the board. You
+</I>&gt;<i> would have a single system, for example, handling just combat resolution,
+</I>&gt;<i> and you would have another system that would keep track of the database...
+</I>
+We may have to add features concerning high-availability, as this scheme
+doesn't allow it : if the computing holding the combat resolution fails, the
+world will be a heaven of peace ;-)
+
+The second point is that if a service grow too much, the load-balancing won't
+respond to the problem. You mentionned this point in your previous mail I
+think.
+
+One possible architecture is to write separate process, and give two or three
+computer the responsiblity to distribute, by monitoring the farm, those
+process. I dunno if such scheme is possible w.r.t. the current NeL objectives
+(?)
+
+Best regards,
+
+ Shaman
+
+--
+Thierry Mallard |
+GnuPG key on wwwkeys.pgp.net |
+key 0xA3D021CB |
+<A HREF="http://thierry.mallard.com">http://thierry.mallard.com</A> |
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000217.html">[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000230.html">[Nel] Dynamic load balancing?</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#229">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#229">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#229">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#229">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+</body></html>