aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000815.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-December/000815.html')
-rw-r--r--pipermail/nel/2001-December/000815.html73
1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000815.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000815.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..51ebfc91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000815.html
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Nel] RE: GPL confusion</TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:hplus%40mindcontrol.org">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000814.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000817.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Nel] RE: GPL confusion</H1>
+ <B>Jon Watte</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:hplus%40mindcontrol.org"
+ TITLE="[Nel] RE: GPL confusion">hplus@mindcontrol.org</A><BR>
+ <I>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:19:49 -0800</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000814.html">[Nel] Gamer question</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000817.html">[Nel] server architecture (front end, load balancing, login service, ....)</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#815">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#815">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#815">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#815">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>&gt;<i> Therefore, the current development code is in the public
+</I>&gt;<i> domain, therefore should be published.
+</I>
+I find two things confusing about this sentence.
+
+1) Something that is under GPL is explicitly NOT in the public
+domain, as something under the GPL suffers substantially more
+restrictive licensing than something that is in the public
+domain. Basically, if it's in the PD, you can do what you want
+to it, except POSSIBLY not mis-represent the origin. The GPL
+imposes many more strictures on your use of the code.
+
+2) The GPL only requires that source code is made available
+free of charge to anyone who purchases binaries, and that no
+restrictions are made on the purchaser's rights to use that
+source code (including subsequent redistribution). If Ryzom is
+not for sale to anyone, then there is no requirement for the
+developers thereof to make any source code available.
+
+Now, the GPL may have changed slightly since I last read it
+through in full, but your statement does not seem to be based
+on the actual language of the GPL.
+
+
+
+</pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000814.html">[Nel] Gamer question</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000817.html">[Nel] server architecture (front end, load balancing, login service, ....)</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#815">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#815">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#815">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#815">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+</body></html>