diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-December/000814.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | pipermail/nel/2001-December/000814.html | 76 |
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000814.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000814.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a630ad3d --- /dev/null +++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000814.html @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Nel] Gamer question</TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:psiegel%40geneticanomalies.com"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000813.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000815.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Nel] Gamer question</H1> + <B>Paul Siegel</B> + <A HREF="mailto:psiegel%40geneticanomalies.com" + TITLE="[Nel] Gamer question">psiegel@geneticanomalies.com</A><BR> + <I>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 08:52:43 -0500</I> + <P><UL> + <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000813.html">[Nel] Landscapes without 3DSMax</A></li> + <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000815.html">[Nel] RE: GPL confusion</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#814">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#814">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#814">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#814">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Kai, from my reading of the GPL, everything wraps around the clause of "if +you distribute". Since Ryzom has yet to be distributed, I don't think +Nevrax is under any obligation to share the source code. + +Under this same logic, I would think that Nevrax will never have to release +the source code of their servers, since such software is really for internal +use only, not to be distributed. Isn't that correct? + +Paul + +><i> I don't want to drag this out eternally, but I see a little lapse of +</I>><i> reasoning. Technically speaking, the development version of Ryzom is +</I>><i> probably currently being linked and tested with NeL, therefore, Ryzom +</I>><i> must inherit the GPL. +</I>><i> Therefore, the current development code is in the public domain, therefore +</I>><i> should be published. Of course, I understand your need to keep Ryzom +</I>><i> "secret" until it is done, releasable and sellable, so that you can put +</I>food +><i> on your plates (and buy big cars for your Venture Capital people), yet, +</I>isn't +><i> this secrecy a violation of the GPL, since Ryzom is GPL'd? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Wouldn't it be better then, for Nevrax, if NeL was LGPL, and thereby +</I>making +><i> it legal (or rather, in accordance to the GPL) for you to keep Ryzom from +</I>><i> public eyes? +</I> + + +</pre> + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000813.html">[Nel] Landscapes without 3DSMax</A></li> + <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000815.html">[Nel] RE: GPL confusion</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#814">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#814">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#814">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#814">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> +</body></html> |