aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000808.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-December/000808.html')
-rw-r--r--pipermail/nel/2001-December/000808.html116
1 files changed, 116 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000808.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000808.html
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..348debb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-December/000808.html
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> GPL specifics -- was: [Nel] Gamer question</TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:lecroart%40nevrax.com">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000806.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000809.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>GPL specifics -- was: [Nel] Gamer question</H1>
+ <B>Vianney Lecroart</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:lecroart%40nevrax.com"
+ TITLE="GPL specifics -- was: [Nel] Gamer question">lecroart@nevrax.com</A><BR>
+ <I>Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:30:36 +0100</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000806.html">GPL specifics -- was: [Nel] Gamer question</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000809.html">[Nel] Using GCC? -- was: GPL specifics</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#808">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#808">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#808">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#808">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Hi,
+
+&gt;<i> Of course, I understand your need to keep Ryzom &quot;secret&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i> until it is done, releasable and sellable, so that you can put food on
+</I>your
+&gt;<i> plates (and buy big cars for your Venture Capital people), yet, isn't this
+</I>&gt;<i> secrecy a violation of the GPL, since Ryzom is GPL'd?
+</I>
+No it isn't. If oneday, we *distribute* Ryzom program and if Ryzom uses a
+GPL library, in this case, we have to give the source of Ryzom. But today,
+we don't distribute Ryzom, so we don't have to give the source. Look the GPL
+licence, it's based on distribution.
+
+Vianney Lecroart
+---
+lead network programmer / nevrax.com
+icq#: 6870415
+homepage: <A HREF="http://ace.planet-d.net">http://ace.planet-d.net</A>
+www.geekcode.com: GCS/E d- s+++: a-- C+++$ UL++ P- L+++&gt;+$ E+&gt;- W++ N+ o? K-
+w++$ O- M- V- PS- PE? Y PGP t 5? X+ R- tv++ b- DI D+ G e++ h+ r-- y?
+
+----- Original Message -----
+From: &quot;Kai Schutte&quot; &lt;<A HREF="mailto:skander@WPI.EDU">skander@WPI.EDU</A>&gt;
+To: &lt;<A HREF="mailto:nel@nevrax.org">nel@nevrax.org</A>&gt;
+Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:07 AM
+Subject: GPL specifics -- was: [Nel] Gamer question
+
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> On Thursday 13 December 2001 09:49, Vincent Archer wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Whenever you get a GPLed program (and the license on the NeL library
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; is such that a program linked to it must be GPL too), under any form,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; you must also be able to access/request/get a copy of the source.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; So anybody who has a Ryzom client has the right to access the source.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Of course, until there IS an official client, almost no one outside
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Nevrax has that right :)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I don't want to drag this out eternally, but I see a little lapse of
+</I>&gt;<i> reasoning. Technically speaking, the development version of Ryzom is
+</I>probably
+&gt;<i> currently being linked and tested with NeL, therefore, Ryzom must inherit
+</I>the
+&gt;<i> GPL.
+</I>&gt;<i> Therefore, the current development code is in the public domain, therefore
+</I>&gt;<i> should be published. Of course, I understand your need to keep Ryzom
+</I>&quot;secret&quot;
+&gt;<i> until it is done, releasable and sellable, so that you can put food on
+</I>your
+&gt;<i> plates (and buy big cars for your Venture Capital people), yet, isn't this
+</I>&gt;<i> secrecy a violation of the GPL, since Ryzom is GPL'd?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Wouldn't it be better then, for Nevrax, if NeL was LGPL, and thereby
+</I>making
+&gt;<i> it legal (or rather, in accordance to the GPL) for you to keep Ryzom from
+</I>&gt;<i> public eyes?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Just thinking out loud...
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> -Kai
+</I>&gt;<i> _______________________________________________
+</I>&gt;<i> Nel mailing list
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="mailto:Nel@nevrax.org">Nel@nevrax.org</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://www.nevrax.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nel">http://www.nevrax.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/nel</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+
+</pre>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000806.html">GPL specifics -- was: [Nel] Gamer question</A></li>
+ <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000809.html">[Nel] Using GCC? -- was: GPL specifics</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#808">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#808">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#808">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#808">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+</body></html>