aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source/blog/2014-11-19-convolution-of-irreducible-characters.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'source/blog/2014-11-19-convolution-of-irreducible-characters.md')
-rw-r--r--source/blog/2014-11-19-convolution-of-irreducible-characters.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/source/blog/2014-11-19-convolution-of-irreducible-characters.md b/source/blog/2014-11-19-convolution-of-irreducible-characters.md
index 58a58925..9b95ca94 100644
--- a/source/blog/2014-11-19-convolution-of-irreducible-characters.md
+++ b/source/blog/2014-11-19-convolution-of-irreducible-characters.md
@@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ __*TL; DR:* The actual PDF write-up is [here](https://dl.bintray.com/zmwangx/gen
Yesterday I was trying to establish the formula for orthogonal primitive central idempotents of a group ring. It is possible to establish the result through the convolution of irreducible characters. However, I stuck quite a while on trying to work out the convolutions themselves. For a formidable and unenlightening proof using "matrix entry functions" (i.e., fix a basis, induce a matrix representation, and explicitly expand everything in matrix elements), see [this post](http://drexel28.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/representation-theory-using-orthogonality-relations-to-compute-convolutions-of-characters-and-matrix-entry-functions/) (in fact, this is just one in a series of posts that lead up to the result). That's a really sad proof.
-It turns out that I really should have been working the other way round --- first establish the orthogonal idempotents (the proof of which is really simple and elegant, I was just trapped in a single thread of thought), then use that to compute the convolution of irreducible characters.
+It turns out that I really should have been working the other way round — first establish the orthogonal idempotents (the proof of which is really simple and elegant, I was just trapped in a single thread of thought), then use that to compute the convolution of irreducible characters.
I feel like this is worth presenting (as the only proof I saw online is the really sad one above), so I TeX'ed it up. I tried to convert to MathJax HTML but eventually gave up (that's the story for another post). So, the write-up is in good ol' PDF, available [here](https://dl.bintray.com/zmwangx/generic/20141119-convolution-of-irreducible-characters.pdf).