diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md b/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md index f68ea55d..690fb119 100644 --- a/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md +++ b/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md @@ -1,9 +1,7 @@ --- -layout: post title: "2014 Nobel Prize in Physics — LED lights, seriously?" date: 2014-11-06 11:08:45 -0800 -comments: true -categories: +date-display: November 6, 2014 --- For some reason, I only learned about this year’s laureates today, through [the reference frame](http://motls.blogspot.com/2014/11/ex-employer-wont-meet-blue-led-nobel.html). The prize goes to the inventors of the LED. Not exciting at all, so I don’t care if I’m ever informed. (Lubos has a good point on why applied physics — well, let’s even widen the concept of applied physics a bit — should not surprise anyone when they appear in a Nobel Prize announcement: “After all, Alfred Nobel might have very well considered his dynamite to be a discovery in physics, too.”) |