aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md b/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md
index bc36bc6d..45550498 100644
--- a/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md
+++ b/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
title: "2014 Nobel Prize in Physics — LED lights, seriously?"
date: 2014-11-06T11:08:45-0800
-date-display: November 6, 2014
+date_display: November 6, 2014
---
For some reason, I only learned about this year’s laureates today, through [the reference frame](http://motls.blogspot.com/2014/11/ex-employer-wont-meet-blue-led-nobel.html). The prize goes to the inventors of the LED. Not exciting at all, so I don’t care if I’m ever informed. (Lubos has a good point on why applied physics — well, let’s even widen the concept of applied physics a bit — should not surprise anyone when they appear in a Nobel Prize announcement: “After all, Alfred Nobel might have very well considered his dynamite to be a discovery in physics, too.”)