diff options
| author | neodarz <neodarz@neodarz.net> | 2018-08-11 20:21:34 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | neodarz <neodarz@neodarz.net> | 2018-08-11 20:21:34 +0200 |
| commit | 0ea5fc66924303d1bf73ba283a383e2aadee02f2 (patch) | |
| tree | 2568e71a7ccc44ec23b8bb3f0ff97fb6bf2ed709 /pipermail/nel/2001-July/000466.html | |
| download | nevrax-website-self-hostable-0ea5fc66924303d1bf73ba283a383e2aadee02f2.tar.xz nevrax-website-self-hostable-0ea5fc66924303d1bf73ba283a383e2aadee02f2.zip | |
Initial commit
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | pipermail/nel/2001-July/000466.html | 103 |
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000466.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000466.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..7f8245a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000466.html @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Nel] Game Rules</TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:novalis%40novalis.org"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000465.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000473.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Nel] Game Rules</H1> + <B>Dave Turner</B> + <A HREF="mailto:novalis%40novalis.org" + TITLE="[Nel] Game Rules">novalis@novalis.org</A><BR> + <I>Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:42:42 -0400</I> + <P><UL> + <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000465.html">[Nel] Congratulations + concerns</A></li> + <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000473.html">[Nel] Italian NeL community</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#466">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#466">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#466">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#466">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE><A HREF="mailto:x5101920@fedro.ugr.es">x5101920@fedro.ugr.es</A> wrote: +><i> +</I>><i> Mensaje citado por: John Cosby <<A HREF="mailto:jcosby@gscyclone.com">jcosby@gscyclone.com</A>>: +</I>><i> +</I>><i> > I've been observing for a bit, and feel a need to jump in here. +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > In many jurisdictions (America and England that I know of), the rules of +</I>><i> > a +</I>><i> > game cannot be copyrighted. Specific presentation, game boards, pieces, +</I>><i> > etc. may by trademarked and copyrighted, but the rules that define +</I>><i> > gameplay +</I>><i> > cannot. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> I am not a lawer... But you say "the rules of a game cannot be copyrighted." +</I>><i> Let's suppose that my computer is a game, k? +</I>><i> So my programs are the rule to play/use the game... so following that logic, +</I>><i> they can't be copyright, so all that EULA as just shit :) +</I>><i> +</I>><i> I have heard that what you can copyright is the style of play, for example you +</I>><i> can copy right D&D, you can copyright the Critical Hit table, but you can't copy +</I>><i> right the method of throwing a dice to resolve action. :) +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Anyway, with all that shit about patents, i think that you will be able to +</I>><i> patent it to. :-( +</I> +You can patent a game rule set: + +<A HREF="http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='5,641,166'.WKU.&OS=PN/5,641,166&RS=PN/5,641,166">http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1='5,641,166'.WKU.&OS=PN/5,641,166&RS=PN/5,641,166</A> +<A HREF="http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r=2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ft00&s1='board+game'&OS="board+game"&RS="board+game"">http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=/netahtml/search-bool.html&r=2&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=ft00&s1='board+game'&OS="board+game"&RS="board+game"</A> + +You can also copyright the precise look of a critical hit table, and the +wording of the hits, and the arrangement of them, but not the +information therein. If the arrangement is the only logical one or +otherwise doesn't involve creativity, then it is not copyrightable (see +ALEXANDRIA DRAFTING CO V. FRANKLIN MAPS at +<A HREF="http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/97D0773P.HTM">http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/opinions/97D0773P.HTM</A>). + +In short, creative stuff (even slightly creative) is copyrightable. +Processes, etc. are patentable. So, the code to implement critical hits +is copyrightable, but if someone reverse engineers and reimplements it, +the author has no recourse. + + +Disclaimer: IANAL. But I know more about copyright, patent, and +trademark law than both of my parents put together. And they are +lawyers :) + +-- +-[Dave Turner Stalk me: (215)-545-2859] +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +Every day I dream that I'll log on to the channel or walk down the +street or get a phone call and you'll be there. We miss you, Pug. + +</pre> + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI> Previous message: <A HREF="000465.html">[Nel] Congratulations + concerns</A></li> + <LI> Next message: <A HREF="000473.html">[Nel] Italian NeL community</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#466">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#466">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#466">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#466">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> +</body></html> |