From 8e21c205b1452b9c708aaedcfd7aa6907d01d772 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhiming Wang Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:27:54 -0800 Subject: HEAD: Mention dear-githuub/dear-github --- source/blog/2016-01-18-me-too-comments-on-github.md | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'source/blog') diff --git a/source/blog/2016-01-18-me-too-comments-on-github.md b/source/blog/2016-01-18-me-too-comments-on-github.md index 9c1189c7..7991ca60 100644 --- a/source/blog/2016-01-18-me-too-comments-on-github.md +++ b/source/blog/2016-01-18-me-too-comments-on-github.md @@ -11,3 +11,7 @@ Me-too comments under bug reports are the most untolerable. If you have more det Me-too comments under feature requests are more understandable, though I genuinely doubt that two or three people requesting a feature instead of one would make a big difference. After all, the issue tracker is not a feature voting platform; most folks understand this and behave themselves, so "me-too demand" isn't even remotely accurate at reflecting demand. Me-too folks: please stop being childish. If you have nothing to add, don't add anything (unless otherwise requested). + +--- + +**01/20/2015 Update.** I came accross [dear-githuub/dear-github](https://github.com/dear-github/dear-github) just now, whose [open letter](https://github.com/dear-github/dear-github/blob/bc7a4f6bc78445905751061bf96f731edda14c25/README.md) also places +1 comments on its list of biggest problems (current count is three) on GitHub. -- cgit v1.2.1