From 15cb7c510305ae7adf4ad5b37c8a628001dcb261 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhiming Wang Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 18:33:30 -0700 Subject: 20150519 Bash: the special slash character in filename expansion --- ...pecial-slash-character-in-filename-expansion.md | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) create mode 100644 source/blog/2015-05-19-bash-the-special-slash-character-in-filename-expansion.md (limited to 'source/blog/2015-05-19-bash-the-special-slash-character-in-filename-expansion.md') diff --git a/source/blog/2015-05-19-bash-the-special-slash-character-in-filename-expansion.md b/source/blog/2015-05-19-bash-the-special-slash-character-in-filename-expansion.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0b2b0949 --- /dev/null +++ b/source/blog/2015-05-19-bash-the-special-slash-character-in-filename-expansion.md @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +--- +title: "Bash: the special slash character in filename expansion" +date: 2015-05-19T18:33:51-07:00 +date-display: May 19, 2015 +--- +It is well-known and common sense that the slash character (`/`) serves a special role in Bash filename expansion. For instance, the asterisk `*` certainly won't match `/` or `.` when used in filename expansion; otherwise, a standalone `*` would match everything in the filesystem. + +However, it is less clear how a literal slash character[^expansion] is treated in extended glob patterns. Naively one would expect it to just match a literal slash, but the real situtation is more complicated than that. Consider the following examples: + +[^expansion]: Here, "a literal slash character" also applies to one that comes from tilde expansion, parameter expansion or command substitution, since they are performed before filename expansion in Bash. + +```bash +bash-4.3$ shopt -s extglob nullglob +bash-4.3$ echo /usr/@(bin|lib) +/usr/bin /usr/lib +bash-4.3$ echo /usr@(/bin|/lib) + +bash-4.3$ [[ /usr/bin == /usr@(/bin|/lib) ]] && echo matching +matching +``` + +As seen from this example, patterns with slash simply doesn't work (in filename expansion) when place in an extended glob pattern list, and there's no error whatsoever. I looked up the [Bash Reference Manual](https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Pattern-Matching.html#Pattern-Matching) and the [Bash Guide](http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashGuide/Patterns) but neither mentioned this behavior. One might need to delve into the source code to say for sure what exactly is going on. + +In comparison, Zsh and its [docs](http://zsh.sourceforge.net/Doc/Release/Expansion.html#Filename-Generation) are much more up front about this issue: + +> Note that grouping cannot extend over multiple directories: it is an error to have a ‘/’ within a group (this only applies for patterns used in filename generation). ... + +And when we run equivalent code in Zsh: + +```zsh +zsh-5.0.5$ setopt NULL_GLOB +zsh-5.0.5$ echo /usr/(bin|lib) +/usr/bin /usr/lib +zsh-5.0.5$ echo /usr(/bin|/lib) +zsh: bad pattern: /usr(/bin|/lib) +zsh-5.0.5$ [[ /usr/bin == /usr(/bin|/lib) ]] && echo matching +matching +``` + +The lesson? Be careful not to use a pattern like `@(path1|path2|path3)` in Bash when the paths are absolute, or relative but contain the slash. Unlike Zsh, Bash just silently fails on a pattern like this, which is rather dangerous in scripts. -- cgit v1.2.1