From 6458fe2de26e181178cf47c026ce989eed815dd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhiming Wang Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 14:44:38 -0700 Subject: pyblog: date-display => date_display, and update posts Looks slightly more professional. --- .../blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md') diff --git a/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md b/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md index bc36bc6d..45550498 100644 --- a/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md +++ b/source/blog/2014-11-06-2014-nobel-prize-in-physics-led-lights-seriously.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- title: "2014 Nobel Prize in Physics — LED lights, seriously?" date: 2014-11-06T11:08:45-0800 -date-display: November 6, 2014 +date_display: November 6, 2014 --- For some reason, I only learned about this year’s laureates today, through [the reference frame](http://motls.blogspot.com/2014/11/ex-employer-wont-meet-blue-led-nobel.html). The prize goes to the inventors of the LED. Not exciting at all, so I don’t care if I’m ever informed. (Lubos has a good point on why applied physics — well, let’s even widen the concept of applied physics a bit — should not surprise anyone when they appear in a Nobel Prize announcement: “After all, Alfred Nobel might have very well considered his dynamite to be a discovery in physics, too.”) -- cgit v1.2.1