From 0ea5fc66924303d1bf73ba283a383e2aadee02f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: neodarz Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 20:21:34 +0200 Subject: Initial commit --- pipermail/nel/2001-July/000465.html | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) create mode 100644 pipermail/nel/2001-July/000465.html (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-July/000465.html') diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000465.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000465.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0eb060fd --- /dev/null +++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000465.html @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ + + + + [Nel] Congratulations + concerns + + + + + + +

[Nel] Congratulations + concerns

+ Dave Turner + novalis@novalis.org
+ Mon, 02 Jul 2001 10:05:00 -0400 +

+
+ +
elijah wright wrote:
+> 
+> > You are totally wrong...
+> > Please go and read about LIBRARY and GPL License...
+> >
+> > What ever you link to a GPL app MUST be GPL. :)
+> > So you have to publish your source under GPL.
+> 
+> incorrect.  you are free to link commercial applications with GPL'ed
+> libraries.  library stubs are an exclusion of sorts to the GPL, as they do
+> not constitute "extending" GPL-code functionality, but simply using it as
+> it is intended to be used.
+> 
+> LGPL-licenses are a very workable alternative; perhaps the nevrax team
+> could countenance dual-licensing any such "rules API" and releasing
+> parallel versions (with identical code) under both licenses.
+> 
+
+1.  Do not use the term commercial when you mean proprietary. 
+Proprietary is the opposite of Free as in Freedom.
+
+2.  The exception to the GPL refers only to system libraries.
+
+See this for details:
+http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl-faq.html#MoneyGuzzlerInc
+
+-- 
+-[Dave Turner                              Stalk me:  (215)-545-2859]
+---------------------------------------------------------------------
+Every day I dream that I'll log on to the channel or walk down the
+street or get a phone call and you'll be there.  We miss you, Pug.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ -- cgit v1.2.1