From 0ea5fc66924303d1bf73ba283a383e2aadee02f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: neodarz Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 20:21:34 +0200 Subject: Initial commit --- pipermail/nel/2001-July/000455.html | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 166 insertions(+) create mode 100644 pipermail/nel/2001-July/000455.html (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-July/000455.html') diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000455.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000455.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..19c82260 --- /dev/null +++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-July/000455.html @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@ + + + + [Nel] [Flame][Offtopic] Congratulations + concerns + + + + + + +

[Nel] [Flame][Offtopic] Congratulations + concerns

+ x5101920@fedro.ugr.es + x5101920@fedro.ugr.es
+ Sun, 01 Jul 2001 11:23:32 +0200 (MET DST) +

+
+ +
> I think u just point out here the Open Source Concept as one 
+> of the biggest joke of the end of twentieth century .
+
+Well, there is stupid people that laugh at important things. 
+Idiots things everything is a joke. :-/
+ 
+> Software code in itself is not that important thing when GPL is
+> concerned, 
+> and beeing able to read it and extract the major concepts of a software
+> is 
+> the great thing  : u always proceed with reverse engineering , - the
+> ever 
+> coming question how do they do that - even when using software like ... 
+> those which don't provide source code .
+
+You didn't understand it...
+GPL is not about reading others code... but giving you the freedom to copy, 
+modify and resuse it under the GPL License.
+
+> That's why GPL is a bad trick to minor companies and therefore for
+> individuals :
+> releasing code shows the overall software architecture , may let u get
+> insights 
+> about hardcore coded sections and definitively unprotects the source
+> providers .
+
+No, because all the code is under the GPL.
+If you read it, and code it on your way, then you could set whatever license you 
+want... it is up to your ethical being to say if you use GPL or not.
+ 
+> Good and Exceptionnal concepts are quickly analysed (you always need to
+> understand
+> the philosophy that drives a software architecture to be able to use it)
+> So major companies will reuse GPLed code that much faster than minor
+> entities
+> - as far as software production is concerned - 
+> I think that instead of promoting talents ,GPL comes with a global
+> leverage tendance .
+
+You are totally wrong... GPL allow us the common user to join and build a big, 
+great product. From my personal experience, I could have never build such 
+project as mine is without GPL.
+
+GPL promote talents as everyone learn fasters, so yes it do a leverage, but you 
+get a better level that those close source fanatic. :-/
+ 
+> Great support is provided to software users , but anyway , any reliable
+> company 
+> protects its sources ( Nevrax Executives don ot read that ). Please note
+> that I'm in no way related to MS . 
+> Isn't GPL the biggest break to creativity we ever seen since communism
+> died 
+> out of realism ?
+
+GPL is not about companies, but about users.
+GPL means to refuse to a lot of rights so that your users can share your work.
+
+I suppose that Nevrax is using GPL because:
+1) It make faster the development.
+2) The user base is also developers base
+3) The open architecture means bugs are found faster and easier.
+4) Port to other OS are almost automatic.
+5) Personal Challenge ( 1st commercial GPL game )
+
+Why in the hell people thing that Communism, Jew or Gay are bad things???
+
+ 
+> Would GPL minds expect great french wine caves to make their 'elevage' 
+> methods publically available - I love great wines - , but who ever
+> thought 
+> that we would get better wine through that way , that's not a reliable
+> way of 
+> thinking and only fools rush in .
+
+Man... you have serious problems with your ethics.
+If you say... "Mine is the best wine of the world", just tell me how you did, 
+and I will do one better. What we have? A wine that is better than the better.
+And as my way is not secret and open and free to use, someone will use it to 
+create an even better one. 
+That is what GPL is about, only fools don't understand.
+
+> I don't want to minimize the brightness of people who go promoting the
+> GPL concept ,
+> (I 've the reputation to use my mind in very efficient ways though ) ,
+> but
+> since I'm tightened to realism in my comapany , I totally agree with GPL
+> detractors .
+> Privacy is definitively needed or the world dies out of any will .
+
+Yes, Your world will die, because a new one will appear where there is no more 
+secrets, where you won't be able to sell ideas, where you won't be allowed to 
+forbid people to copy and share apps.
+ 
+> I realize i might be removed from the list after that ,
+> but I don't think it will happen .
+
+GPL people is different. We tollerate different opinions.
+ 
+> Back to development and implementation , lots of to do ahead (I wouldn't
+> be there if not)
+
+You are really inside... you should go back to school and learn something about 
+ethics.
+
+REgards,
+
+                  Miguel Angel Blanch Lardin
+
+nuclear cia fbi spy password code encrypt president bomb iran irak korea cuba
+Ala yihad mosad kgb free freedom human rights yugoslavia kosovo ebola dna 
+ 
+                    -- Echelon must die --
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ -- cgit v1.2.1