From 0ea5fc66924303d1bf73ba283a383e2aadee02f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: neodarz Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2018 20:21:34 +0200 Subject: Initial commit --- pipermail/nel/2001-January/000155.html | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) create mode 100644 pipermail/nel/2001-January/000155.html (limited to 'pipermail/nel/2001-January/000155.html') diff --git a/pipermail/nel/2001-January/000155.html b/pipermail/nel/2001-January/000155.html new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e9e24f9a --- /dev/null +++ b/pipermail/nel/2001-January/000155.html @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ + + + + [Nel] gcc and non-ANSI + + + + + + +

[Nel] gcc and non-ANSI

+ Lionel Berenguier + berenguier@nevrax.com
+ Tue, 23 Jan 2001 16:02:36 +0100 +

+
+ +
> I'm using gcc/g++ 2.95.3, and it seems that it doesn't like anonymous
+structures
+> (see gcc output below). I read that it's definitively not a standard
+feature,
+> and was orginally a MS VC++ extension, that was more or less adopted by
+others.
+> Seems that the gcc guy didn't approved it, but I didn't checked in depth.
+I
+> guess others are using the egcs c++ (1.1.2) frontend ?
+> I personnaly don't approve being able to acces a member without naming the
+> structure ...
+
+You're right.  Fixed... :o)
+
+regards
+
+
+
+ + + + + + +
+

+ -- cgit v1.2.1